The online video and p2p revolution being halted/slowed down by carriers?
and
, and
and of course
and The one big challenge facing these companies is the adoption of the technology by the consumers. And a huge challenge they are facing there is the carriers. The carriers are either lowering the Quality of Service (QOS) for the video traffic or in some cases blocking the traffic completely. Networking companies like Cisco are getting huge contracts to build such technology and routers/filters for the carriers. And carriers are very reluctant in giving this bandwidth away for free. Thus the net neutrality debate.
The following article is an interesting read on the topic. http://www.last100.com/2007/05/28/will-isps-spoil-the-online-video-party
One interesting twist in the tale is that these video companies are backed and lead by bigwigs.
Joost is sponsored by Kazaa/Skype founders Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis. Interestingly Cisco's SVP Mike Volpi who recently left Cisco is now heading Joost as their CEO. He knows the challenges Cisco offers to this mix.
Youtube is Google's
Skype is eBay's
AOL video backed by AOL
Veoh got a lot of funding and is backed by Time Warner.
So there is a real battle ensuing, and hotshots are in the game.
Will be interesting to see how this unfolds. I feel that carriers will eventually relent and let these companies use the bandwidth but in return will surely get a piece of the action, which is what they want.



). Liked some of the observations made by Om and Niall in the article. It starts off with a discussion of some of the recent burnouts of some web2.0 companies such as